-
To tell the truth.
-
The public have been lied to.
-
The public do not have access to the truth.
-
Although the truth is widely known by those that need to know, few dare or do speak it.
-
The countless victims who were assaulted by the state, are too damaged to defend themselves.
-
There were thousand's of victims of Operation Ore, adults and children alike.
-
Some in appalling circumstances, many dead.
-
The injustices must be exposed.
-
Those responsible for them must be exposed.
-
Whatever machinery, laws and powers that allowed this to happen must be dismantled. Help must be brought to the victims.
- The rights and freedoms that would have prevented this must be cast in stone.
- How did they miss obvious evidence of hacking?
Evidence which was identified within hours of a proper investigation being undertaken.
- How did they miss obvious evidence of credit card fraud?
Evidence which was similarly identified during preliminary examinations.
- If they were aware of this evidence, why did they conceal it from defendants and continue destroying people's lives?
- If they were not aware of this evidence, why didn't they look for it? Did they not have a duty to confirm the accuracy and reliability of the evidence they were presenting to the courts? Even a cursory examination was sufficient to identify it and once identified a deeper analysis immediately revealed the extent of the deception.
- If they were truly unaware of the frauds -
Why was it necessary to present false evidence supported by sequences of increasingly obvious lies?
Why were certain named individuals not prosecuted?
As successive prosecution witnesses were discredited why were new ones brought in to attempt to perpetuate the lies? Did it never occur to them that perhaps the evidence itself was flawed?
M was a professional man, good job, good income, married with two children. Life was a peach. M toured the Internet and that included surfing adult sites. As a consequence, M was on the Ore list having visited a site using the Landslide payment system.
In violation of the law and his rights as a citizen, he was arrested and detained by the UK police. Also illegal, the police searched his house and removed his computer. His computer was subject to forensic examination. As was the norm, no issues relating to Landslide were found.
In all the hours M had used his computer on the Internet, in all the places he had been, one link he had clicked resulted in a number of illicit images being recorded on his computer. These were recovered by the police and M had to face court where he would be judged on the quantity and the exact content of each image.
Many had alleged that each time these images were looked at, it was an act of abuse of a child. The police had re-enforced these and other wild claims, ignoring perhaps they were committing these abuses themselves and their offending behaviour was illegal until 01/05/2004.
The police and social services considered M a dangerous man because of what had been found on his computer. M was cast out from his family home and not allowed to see his family. His name was plastered in the press, his new refuge attacked many times, but the police did not defend him, when it comes to law and order, suddenly this man was no longer a citizen.
M was sent on a rehabilitation course. He didn't have a problem requiring help of course. As a result, the system considered the man to be in denial, dangerous and untreatable.
One second in his life, illicit imagery on his computer and 7 years as a dangerous sex offender. For that, two children lost their father and one man lost everything. It is too late now for his wife and children, but that man is out there still, and he needs your help.
we are all individuals, this is a fictitious story, based on true stories
~ PUNISHING THE INNOCENT IS A CRIME ~
|